Sunday, 3 February 2013

Arshad will never produce a film

ARSHAD~1.jpg
After lying low for a long time, Arshad is poised to return with a bang with a bunch of releases this year. While Zila Ghaziabad and Jolly L.L.B. are complete, he has also started work on Dedh Ishqiya with Madhuri Dixit. So careerwise, things really seem to be looking up for the actor.
While there is no end to his acting ambitions, Arshad is clear that he is never going to get into production again. He says, “You never know what happens to you tomorrow. As a producer, I turned out to be a flop producer. I have burnt my fingers tremendously with Hum Tum Aur Ghost, so don’t expect me to produce a film again.” He feels it’s the toughest job in the industry. “On my set, everyone had a gala time. They came, enjoyed and went back,” he recalls, adding, “Yes, I will produce a film only when I have enough money to throw away, so that I don’t get bankrupt.”
Wise decision, we say

Salman Khan faces homicide charge
by lipika varma/afp
 

MUMBAI: A court in Mumbai has ruled that Bollywood star Salman Khan will be tried for culpable homicide over a 2002 hit-and-run case which could land him behind bars for 10 years, his lawyer said on Friday.

If convicted he faces up to 10 years in jail. Deepesh Mehta, Khan’s lawyer, says a magistrate accepted an appeal by state government prosecutors that he should be charged with homicide instead of causing death by negligence, which carries a maximum of two years in jail. “We will however challenge this decision in the High Court,” Mehta told AFP.
One man was killed and another three were injured when Khan allegedly rammed his car into a group of homeless people sleeping on a Bombay sidewalk in September 2002.
Khan was being tried under a lesser charge of rash and negligent driving but prosecutors had filed an application for the charges to be upgraded, which the court upheld. The new offences carry sentences of up to 10 years in prison.
“The court said there was enough evidence to show the act was not incidental and hence the case should be tried under a more serious section,” the Times of India reported on Friday, quoting another of Khan’s lawyers Kaushal Thakkar.
In view of the graver charges against him, the actor would be required to appear before the sessions court where the trial is expected to start Feb 11.
The trial in the case started before the Bandra Magistrate Court in 2006.
Khan is one of Bollywood’s biggest stars and has starred in more than 80 Hindi films, he is often known as the ‘bad boy’ of Bollywood. He has been a controversial figure since he first broke into Bollywood in the late 1980s.
In 1998, he spent more than a week in prison for killing endangered Indian gazelles in the northern state of Rajasthan

Salman Khan faces homicide trial
 

By AFP/by lipika varma
February 01, 2013 - Updated 1455 PKT 
From Web Edition
 
 
 
MUMBAI: A court in Mumbai has ruled that Bollywood star Salman Khan will be tried for culpable homicide over a 2002 hit-and-run case which could land him behind bars for 10 years, his lawyer said Friday.
 
Khan is alleged to have rammed his Toyota Land Cruiser vehicle onto a pavement and over five sleeping homeless people in suburban Mumbai, killing one and injuring four others.
 
Dipesh Mehta, who represents Khan, said a sessions court had on Thursday "directed the police to book him for culpable homicide not amounting to murder". "We will however challenge this decision in the High Court," Mehta told AFP.
 
Khan was being tried under a lesser charge of rash and negligent driving but prosecutors had filed an application for the charges to be upgraded, which the court upheld. The new offences carry sentences of up to 10 years in prison.
 
"The court said there was enough evidence to show the act was not incidental and hence the case should be tried under a more serious section," the Times of India reported on Friday, quoting another of Khan's lawyers Kaushal Thakkar.
 
The star has been asked to be present in court on March 11. Khan -- known for his muscular physique and off-camera fits of temper -- has been a controversial figure since he first broke into Bollywood in the late 1980s in the romance film "Maine Pyar Kiya" (I'm In Love). In 1998, he spent more than a week in prison for killing endangered Indian gazelles in the northern state of Rajasthan.
 

 
 
 
Lipika VarmaMonday, January 21, 2013 
From Print Edition
 
 
 
MUMBAI: A new Indian film looks at the sensitive topic of sexual harassment in the workplace at a time when Bollywood has come under fire for its portrayal of women, after a fatal gang-rape shocked the nation.
 
“Inkaar” (Denial), a Hindi movie combining crime and romance, explores how a relationship turns sour between Rahul, the alpha male CEO of an advertising agency, and his ambitious protégé Maya, who rises up the company’s ranks.
 
She claims sexual harassment, a charge he flatly denies, and the film develops through a series of flashbacks as the pair tell their story to a social worker looking at the case.
 
The theme is an unusual one in an industry that has faced fresh criticism for objectifying women as merely skimpily dressed arm candy for a macho hero.
 
The brutal gang-rape and murder of a 23-year-old student on a bus in New Delhi on December 16 sparked shockwaves and protests across the nation, along with much soul-searching about its treatment and portrayal of women.
 
Director Sudhir Mishra said the timing of Inkaar’s release, on Friday, was a coincidence but he hoped the film would spark debate on under-discussed issues facing modern and rapidly urbanising India.
 
“The film explains the environment of a workplace from both men’s and women’s points of view,” he told AFP.
 
“Everyone has a point of view on a subject, especially something as strong as sexual harassment. I have come across a cluster of people who work in different offices and they have similar stories to narrate.”
 
Inkaar’s initial reviews say it has failed to live up to its promise, and should have pushed further its exploration of gender politics in the office.
 
“The tough questions that the film had started to lay out for us... all get buried under a hurried, compromised end,” said The Indian Express. But film trade analyst Komal Nahta described it as a “brave attempt” to take on a “bold subject”.
 
“Films based on sexual harassment should be made more and more, but the filmmaker should handle this delicate subject with utmost care,” he told AFP.
 
While Bollywood avoids on-screen sexual contact and even kissing scenes, questions over its alleged commodification of women have intensified since last month’s horrific gang-rape.
 
The “item number” has come under particular fire—a musical performance often unrelated to the plot, featuring scantily clad women in sexually suggestive dance routines.
 
When the film returns to the storyline, the main female character is often tirelessly wooed by the male protagonist until she gives in to him.
 
“We talk about public or police apathy towards crimes against women but nothing comes close to the antipathy shown to women by Bollywood,” said award-winning playwright Mahesh Dattani in a scathing column. “Bollywood loathes women. Bollywood is a monster that has gone horribly wrong,” he said.
 
Shabana Azmi, a 62-year-old actor known for her roles in Indian New Wave cinema from the 1970s, suggested there was some responsibility on younger women in the business to insist on better portrayal of female characters.
 
“Celebration of a woman’s sensuality is healthy but commodification is not and our heroines will do well to make more discerning choices,” she said on Twitter.
 
Others in the industry defended its movies, saying Bollywood had become a soft target that could not be blamed for inciting violence.
 
Chitrangada Singh, the female lead in Inkaar, said song-and-dance numbers in films had been around for decades. She pointed in particular to Helen, a legendary Indian star in the 1970s and the most famous “item girl”. “Helen did a lot of dances during my mother’s time but men were not like this,” she told AFP.
 
Veteran art film actor and television presenter Farooq Sheikh suggested that scripts had deteriorated over the years. “Intelligent writers need to be given a chance,” he said.
 
An alternative Bollywood is starting to emerge: a crop of “Hindi Indie” directors have done well on the festival circuit and even some mainstream films have departed from the typical love story themes.
 
Films such as last year’s thriller “Kahaani” (Story) and “The Dirty Picture” a year earlier, both starring Vidya Balan, have won praise for presenting stronger female characters.
 
Among India’s leading independent filmmakers is Anurag Kashyap, who said it was up to the audience to make movie-makers adapt.
 
“Cinema is business and whatever will work, they’ll keep doing that,” he told NDTV. “You want that to change, stop watching those films... stop buying those tickets.”
 

 

Saturday, 2 February 2013

SRK clears the air

by lipika varma
Published: Thu, Jan 31, 2013
AVS Newsroom
Posted by: AVS Newsroom


SRK clears the air
Soon after writing a piece for Outlook Turning Point 2013 (published by The New York Times) titled ‘Being Khan’, Shah Rukh Khan is back in the midst of controversy.
The article had created a huge hue and cry with Pakistan Minister Rehman Malik saying that India should provide the actor with necessary security. New Delhi retorted “asking them to mind their own business”.
In an attempt to clear the air, Khan said, “Ironically the article, I wrote was actually meant to reiterate that on some occasions my being an Indian Muslim film star is misused by bigots and narrow minded people who have misplaced religious ideologies for small gains… and ironically the same has happened through this article…once again.”
In the article Khan had written: “According to me, all our lives we are defined by three identities. Two of which are fortunately acquired by birth and are a matter of unconditional love and acceptance. The first identity is acquired by where one is born. Our Motherland. That defines us. So foremost all of us here like me are proud Indians. As I said being an Indian and my parents’ child is an unconditional accepted truth of my life and I am very proud of both. So I am a Khan, but no stereotyped image is factored into my idea of who I am. Instead, the living of my life has enabled me to be deeply touched by the love of millions of Indians. I have felt this love for the last 20 years regardless of the fact that my community is a minority within the population of India. I have been showered with love across national and cultural boundaries; they appreciate what I do for them as an entertainer.”
“Sometimes, my children ask me what religion they belong to and, like a good Hindi movie hero, I roll my eyes up to the sky and declare philosophically, ‘you are an Indian first and your religion is Humanity’, or sing them ‘tu hindu banega na musalmaan banega - insaan ki aulaad hai insaan banega’,” says Khan.
He said he didn’t understand the basis of the controversy.
“I think some of the people have not even read it and are reacting to comments of people, who in turn have also not read it. So I implore you all to first read it. Second, if you read it, nowhere does the article state or imply directly or indirectly that I feel unsafe, troubled or disturbed in India,” says SRK.
Furthermore he says, “It does not even vaguely say that I am ungrateful for the love that I have received in a career spanning 20 years. On the contrary the article only says that in spite of bigoted thoughts of some of the people that surround us, I am untouched by scepticism because of the love I have received by my countrymen and women.”
He added, “I would like to tell all those who are offering me unsolicited advice that we in India are extremely safe and happy. We have an amazing democratic, free and secular way of life. In the environs that we live here in my country India, we have no safety issues regarding life or material. As a matter of fact it is irksome for me to clarify this non-existent issue.
“Let’s not be misled by tools which use religion as an anchor for unrest and a policy of divide and rule,” says Shah Rukh.

by lipika varma
 
Published: Wed, Jan 30, 2013

Posted by:
 AVS Newsroom
Salim Khan, who co-wrote ‘Zanjeer’ with Javed Akhtar, has gone to the Scriptwriter’s Association, demanding a fair share of royalty from Apoorva Lakhia who is remaking the Amitabh Bachchan film. Khan has demanded a compensation of Rs 6 crore as royalty from Reliance Entertainment and Amit Mehra (producers of the remake). “We are not against the remaking of films. Tell me, aren’t they going to sell their product? The product comprises the script, music etc. The situational emotional drama showcased in ‘Zanjeer’ stands pivotal to the making. Also, they are reviving the memories of the actions and drama played by Amitabh Bachchan and Pran who are remembered for their electrifying performances. ‘Zanjeer’ is a valuable film written by us. Filmmaking is a business and it needs to be dealt with as such,” he says.

 

'I was very hurt'

DC | Lipika Varma | 02nd Feb 2013
With his film finally being given the go-ahead for release, veteran star Kamal Haasan seems to be in a jubilant mood, but his underlying anxieties and pain were evident even as he addressed the media in Mumbai on Thursday.
On Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa's decision on the Vishwaroopam ban, he merely offered, "The matter is sub-judice now, so I can't speak about it." Does he believe that the ban was a politically motivated revenge move on the CM's part? He shoots back, "Let me clarify one thing. Here at this press meet, I can see so many heads right now and it's difficult to tell who is a trouble maker and who is not. Similarly, several heads may have made the decision together. I will not be able to mention any names. For now, the government has agreed to revoke the ban. So let's see what's in store for us." Does he agree that there exists a fair amount of 'saffron terrorism', which is being supported by some ministers? "This is a matter of debate. I will only say that any terrorism, be it green, blue or whatever, should not be supported. My film Vishwaroopam doesn’t support terrorism at all and neither does it showcase Muslims in a bad light. In fact, the film portrays the intelligence of Muslim women and I am sure that in the future, many more talented Muslim women will make it to the top professionally," he points out.
"I was terribly hurt by the things some Muslim authorities said about my film. I’m not saying that they were not intelligent enough to discuss but there are a few more intelligent people in our country who could debate better without deviating from the real issue," adds Kamal, about the controversy surrounding his film.
"My 77-year-old elder brother Chandra Haasan, who heads Rajkamal films, is relieved by the government’s latest assurances and has slept soundly for four hours for the first time in three days," he shares further. About support from his peers, he says, “All my colleagues from Tollywood came to me and offered me coffee. Their concern makes me feel happy. We have lost a huge amount of money, around Rs 60 to Rs 70 crores, but money is not important compared to the respect of my country."
In the past couple of days, there have been several reports of the star threatening to leave India in search of a secular place. Does he really feel that way? "I didn’t say it to threaten. I said it because I was hurt by all the developments. For me, this cannot be any kind of publicity. In fact, I condemn such publicity because it shows my country India in bad light. We are a country of people from different castes, creeds and religion. I myself do not profess any religion. I’ve been mistaken for a Muslim because of my surname but it has never bothered me. Mahatma Gandhi once said 'I will live here, because I belong to this place'. Similarly, I belong to India; I make films for my Tamil, Telugu and Hindi audiences in return for all the love from my fans. Why would I even think of leaving my country? I only said it because I was literally hurt. And I will stick to my words if this is repeated."